Native Advertising vs. Display Advertising: Which One Performs Better

Compare display and native ads to see which format sparks better user interest. Discover how each approach affects clicks, conversions, and brand perception. Choose the right strategy to boost campaign performance.

Advertising today goes beyond simple banners or text links. Brands seek to grab attention, appear trustworthy, and drive real engagement. That is why more advertisers are exploring native ads vs display ads to see which format fits best. Both approaches aim to reach audiences online, but they work differently.

Recent data highlights their impact: native ads can generate up to 60% more engagement than display ads, thanks to their seamless integration. Meanwhile, display ads dominate budgets, with over 90% of digital ad spend allocated to them in some sectors. Native ads blend into a site’s layout, mimicking surrounding content, while display ads stand out with bold visuals in designated spots. Marketers debate, which leads to higher clicks, conversions, and brand recall. Some values display’s bold style, while others lean on the native’s subtle approach.

This article will clarify each style’s core features and discuss when to use each format for maximum benefit. You can choose the best approach for your brand’s goals by understanding the nuances.

What Are Native Ads and Display Ads?

Display and native ads are two key digital advertising categories, but they function differently.

Display ads often appear as banners or sidebars on a webpage. They can include

• images;
• graphics;
• short text.

These are typically seen at the top, bottom, or along the sides of a page. Most users spot them immediately because they contrast with the site’s usual style.

Native ads are different. They integrate into the platform’s existing design. They might show up as

recommended content or sponsored posts that match the website’s colors, fonts, or overall structure. The idea is to blend in, making the ad appear part of the page’s normal content flow.

A native ad vs display ad differs mainly in how it aligns with the user experience. Native spots feel more like an organic extension, whereas display banners are more direct and easy to identify.

Some publishers allow both types of ad placements. For instance, a news site might feature a display banner at the top and a native link recommendation at the bottom of an article. It’s common to use them side by side. The brand can then see which performs better in terms of click-throughs or conversions.

The difference between display and native ads also extends to user perception. Many argue that native ad formats may be less disruptive, enhancing the chance a user will interact with the content. Display ads are more visually obvious, which can be good for quick brand exposure but might be easier for a user to ignore or block.

Key Differences Between Native Ads and Display Ads

There is more to the difference between native ads and display ads than just how they look.

1. Design is a major factor. Display advertisements often feature strong color contrasts or bold images. Native ads aim to blend into the page’s structure, adopting similar fonts, layouts, and tone. This can make them feel like editorial content.
2. Placement also matters. Display banners typically occupy specific spots designated on the webpage. Native posts, however, might appear in news feeds, recommended links, or as sponsored articles. This difference influences how the user interacts with each. With the display, you see a clear ad. With native, it may be less obvious that it is a paid promotion — though proper labeling is essential to maintain trust.
3. Engagement patterns often differ. Some brands find that native ads produce higher time-on-page metrics because users click and stick around to read. Display spots might deliver faster brand awareness since they’re front and center. On the other hand, some users have “banner blindness” and skip over anything that looks like an ad. That can reduce the performance of display banners.
4. Campaign objectives also guide the choice. For broad visibility or quick announcements, display can do well. For deeper storytelling or content marketing, native might be better. That is because native placements give advertisers more space to develop a narrative within a site’s look and feel.
5. Cost structures can vary too. Some providers charge per thousand impressions, while others focus on cost per click or engagement metrics. It often depends on the ad network you choose.

The difference between native and display ads covers style, placement, user engagement, and campaign goals. Marketers need to reflect on how each approach aligns with their brand image and the user experience they want to deliver.

When to Use Display Advertising

There are specific situations where display versus native advertising leans heavily in favor of display banners.

Scenario #1. Brand Building

One common scenario is brand building. Display banners offer immediate visibility. They can occupy prominent page spots, making them ideal for new product launches. If your goal is quick recognition rather than subtle integration, a bright banner can grab attention instantly.

Scenario #2. Remarketing

Display can also be beneficial for remarketing campaigns. If you want to remind users about items they viewed on your site, a well-placed display banner can do the trick. These ads stand out and can bring users back to complete a purchase. This approach is often used in e-commerce, where a user abandons a cart, and the brand later reminds them with a display promotion.

Scenario #3. Creative Content

Another reason to choose display is the ability to run visually striking creative content. Banners let you incorporate high-resolution images, animations, or even interactive elements. That’s why some brands pick the display ads to highlight big sales, time-sensitive deals, or special events. A colorful banner can communicate urgency effectively.

When analyzing display against native ads, keep in mind that displays might come with more ad-blocker issues. Many people recognize standard banner formats and install tools to remove them. Also, some users glaze over the top or side areas of a webpage, ignoring banners. Still, if your brand wants large-scale awareness and quick updates, display can deliver. You can run your banners on major websites, often at a broad scale.

Budget considerations also matter. Display placements can be cost-effective, especially if you negotiate volume deals or target specific site categories. Some businesses do well with a combination of high-impact banners on recognized portals. That way, they get the brand name in front of a substantial audience fast. Let’s now discuss when native ads take center stage for advertisers.

When to Use Native Advertising

Marketers choose native ads when they want a seamless integration with a website’s or app’s design. This approach works well for storytelling or detailed brand messaging. If you have in-depth information to share, a native ad vs display ad approach might engage readers more effectively. By fitting into the site’s look and feel, a native spot lowers the user’s defenses, making them more likely to click and explore further.

Avoiding Intrusive Ads

This style is also helpful for reaching audiences who are sensitive to intrusive ads. Many users skip banners or find them disruptive. With native content, the advertisement becomes a natural part of the feed. It may prompt curiosity because it looks like another article or recommendation.

Appearing More Editorial

Another time to opt for native is when you want to appear more editorial. If your brand invests in content marketing — like thought leadership articles, product how-tos, or lifestyle pieces, native ads can link to that longer form. People interested in the topic are more inclined to read. This can lead to higher dwell time and deeper engagement. Over time, that could build more trust.

Finance and Tech

Native is also a good fit in industries with complex products, such as finance or technology. A short banner cannot always convey the value of a complicated service. But a native placement can direct readers to a more detailed post or e-book. They have the chance to learn without feeling like they are reading an obvious promotion.

Keep in mind that while subtlety can lead to better engagement, transparency is key. You must label the ad as sponsored or promoted. If not, users can feel misled once they realize it’s a paid placement. That’s bad for brand image.

Performance Comparison: Which One Converts Better?

Brands often ask about the difference between native ads and display ads in terms of raw conversions. The answer varies by industry and specific audience. However, certain trends do emerge.

• Native promotions typically boast higher click-through rates. Users may treat them like organic posts. They might click to learn more, which can lead to a bigger pool of interested leads.
• Display banners deliver broad reach. If your aim is generating awareness or swift branding impact, you might see success with large banner placements. Some advertisers measure success by impressions rather than clicks. Display is often ideal for that. Think about times when a brand wants to appear on popular news portals or target many user segments at once.

Ad fatigue is another factor. Over time, some display formats see drops in engagement as users become accustomed to ignoring them. Native can remain fresh because it adapts to the environment. That said, it depends on consistent, high-quality creativity. Low-effort or misleading native content can cause frustration and harm conversions.

It’s hard to declare one style as always superior in terms of conversion. Each method can excel, depending on the product, placement, and how success is measured.

Pros and Cons of Native Ads vs. Display Ads

Choosing between native and display ads is a key decision for marketers aiming to optimize their campaigns. Both formats offer distinct advantages and challenges, depending on your goals, audience, and resources.

Below, we outline the pros and cons of each to help you understand their strengths and limitations.

Pros of Native Ads

• Seamless Integration. Native ads blend smoothly with a site’s theme, making them less intrusive and more natural to the user experience.
• Higher Engagement. Users are more likely to interact with native ads since they don’t immediately register as promotions, reducing ad fatigue.
• Effective for Storytelling. Ideal for longer, narrative-driven content, allowing brands to connect with audiences through compelling stories.

Cons of Native Ads

• Measurement Challenges. Their subtle integration can make it tricky to track performance metrics accurately.
• Risk of Deception. If sponsorship isn’t clearly disclosed, users might feel misled, potentially damaging trust.

Pros of Display Ads

• Instant Visibility. Designed to stand out, display ads excel at quickly introducing or reinforcing brand messages.
• Effective for Retargeting. Their familiar format makes them perfect for reminding users of your brand or products.
• Broad Reach. Easily placed across various sites, ensuring wide visibility and recognition.

Cons of Display Ads

• Banner Blindness. Users often ignore display ads due to their overt promotional nature, reducing effectiveness.
• User Experience Disruption. Poorly placed banners can interrupt browsing, leading to annoyance and disengagement.

Both native and display ads bring unique value to the table. Native ads shine in engagement and subtlety, while display ads dominate in visibility and reach. Your choice may hinge on design needs or cost, where display can be cheaper per impression, though native might yield higher-quality leads.

Native or Display: Which One Should You Choose?

Many marketers seek a simple answer to display ads vs native ads. The truth is that one format might fit certain objectives better than the other.

• If you’re launching a new product and need fast, widespread awareness, display ads can claim digital space quickly with recognizable banners.
• For deeper engagement or content-driven campaigns, native ads blend into relevant platforms, encouraging users to linger and interact.

When weighing the difference between native and display ads, consider your budget and creative assets. Display might be cheaper sometimes, especially if you opt for general placements. Native content can demand more resources to produce an appealing, context-friendly advertisement. You might have to craft blog posts or articles in addition to your usual brand visuals.

Another factor is your audience’s tolerance for ads. Are they typically annoyed by overt promotions? If so, the subtle approach of a native campaign can help you maintain goodwill. Alternatively, if your brand is in a competitive field, like fashion or consumer electronics, eye-catching display banners might help you stand out on busy websites.

The display vs native ads debate can also hinge on long-term goals. If you aim to build trust and authority, native placements that resemble editorial content could earn you credibility. If your main goal is immediate clicks to a landing page, you might test both formats in A/B scenarios. Some brands discover that a combined strategy yields the best results. They place bold banners on major pages for broad reach, while they also embed subtle native pieces in relevant publications.

Ultimately, align your choice with your objectives, audience preferences, and resources. A/B testing both formats might reveal the perfect balance for your brand.

See how our expertise can help you to earn more

Our tech staff and AdOps are formed by the best AdTech and MarTech industry specialists with 10+ years of proven track record!

BOOK A CALL

Final Thoughts: Maximizing Your Advertising Performance

Choosing between display vs native advertising can be a challenge. Some campaigns need a quick spark of brand awareness that banners offer. Others aim for deeper engagement, better served by subtle, content-like placements.

Experimentation is key. Try short pilot campaigns with each format. Track metrics like clicks, conversions, or time on site. If one method outperforms the other, look for reasons why.

Was it the design? The copy? The targeting? By analyzing results, you can tailor future ads more effectively.

There is no universal winner in the debate on native ads versus display ads. Each approach can excel, depending on your brand’s goals and the context. Make sure to refine your creatives, watch your data, and evolve your strategies over time. This is how you maximize performance in a changing digital landscape.

However, with the right partner at your side, you can take the most out of both approaches. Contact us and have the agency with enough experience and expertise to turn ads into revenue working for you.