Top 10 Media Buying Tools to Automate and Optimize Campaigns

Teams implement automation to enhance their speed performance while maintaining their pace and detecting problems which prevent budget expenses from surpassing established limits. The path to victory requires players to pick suitable game components while creating clear rules which help monitors track AI system activities.

This list covers media planning tools and activation platforms, plus a few utilities that help with optimization and reporting. You can mix these digital media planning tools based on channel mix, spend, and how much control you need.

Top 10 Media Buying Tools

Media buying tools function as the main component which enables teams to develop strategies for paid advertising campaigns which they can deploy and enhance through various marketing channels. The list includes enterprise DSPs and retail-first platforms and paid social automation suites and ops-heavy systems which serve organizations with big budgets and numerous staff members. 

The tool summaries describe each tool by explaining its purpose and implementation position and detailing all associated system compromises. The section enables you to choose between different options by evaluating their ability to reach target audiences and their control capabilities and measurement requirements and their need for human intervention.

1. Google Display & Video 360 (DV360)

Link: https://marketingplatform.google.com/about/display-video-360/

What it is: DV360 is Google’s enterprise DSP for programmatic display, video, CTV, audio, and some native inventory, with strong Google ecosystem integrations.

Pros:

• Strong reach across Google inventory and many exchanges
• Solid brand safety and audience features inside the Google stack
• Useful workflow features for large teams (roles, approvals, partners)

Cons:

• Steeper learning curve than smaller platforms
• Works best when your measurement stack also sits in Google

How to use it:

• Run cross-channel programmatic buys with frequency controls and pacing rules
• Use it as the core media buying tool when you already rely on Google Campaign Manager and Google audiences

2. The Trade Desk (Kokai)

Link: https://www.thetradedesk.com/

What it is: The Trade Desk operates as an independent DSP which enables programmatic advertising across CTV and display and audio and native formats through its Kokai AI layer for buying and optimization.

Pros:

• Strong CTV buying and partner ecosystem
• Good reporting depth and inventory controls
• Flexible approach for multi-exchange strategies

Cons:

• You need time to set up clean taxonomies and naming rules
• Some features depend on partner integrations and data access

How to use it:

• Scale CTV and omnichannel campaigns with consistent measurement
• Standardize workflows across markets if you manage multiple clients

3. Amazon DSP

Link: https://advertising.amazon.com/solutions/products/amazon-dsp

What it is: Amazon DSP helps you buy display and video on Amazon properties and across the open web, with access to Amazon shopping and streaming audiences.

Pros:

• Strong commerce intent signals for many verticals
• Good options for streaming and video inventory
• Works well for retail-driven performance goals

Cons:

• Best fit when Amazon data is central to your strategy
• Reporting logic differs from other DSPs, so comparisons can get trick

How to use it:

• Run upper-funnel video and retargeting tied to shopping behavior
• Use it alongside other media buying tools to cover both commerce and non-commerce inventory

4. Meta Advantage+

Link: https://www.facebook.com/business/ads/meta-advantage-plus

What it is: Meta Advantage+ is Meta’s automation suite for campaign setup, audience expansion, placements, and creative testing.

Pros:

• Fast setup and strong performance for many ecommerce use cases
• Good automated testing patterns for creatives and audiences
• Simple workflow for smaller teams

Cons:

• Less transparency and manual control in some configurations
• You need strict guardrails to avoid waste at scale

How to use it:

• Automate prospecting and retargeting with clear budget caps
• Pair it with a media planning tool that keeps targets and tracking consistent across channels

5. Smartly.io

Link: https://www.smartly.io/

What it is: Smartly.io focuses on creative automation, testing, and campaign operations for paid social, with strong support for large creative volumes.

Pros:

• Helps speed up creative production and iteration
• Supports structured testing and rules-based workflows
• Useful for teams that ship many variants

Cons:

• Value depends on your creative pipeline maturity
• Not a replacement for channel-level strategy

How to use it:

• Automate creative versioning, naming, and QA
• Use it to reduce manual work in social operations and reporting

6. Skai

Link: https://skai.io/

What it is: Skai provides tools for search, social, and ecommerce media management, with automation, pacing, and optimization features.

Pros:

• Strong coverage for retail media and search-social coordination
• Helpful automation for bids, budgets, and alerts
• Works well for multi-account management

Cons:

• Setup takes effort if your account structure is messy
• Feature depth varies by channel and integration

How to use it:

• Coordinate retail media, paid search, and paid social in one workflow
• Automate pacing and rules for large catalog campaigns

7. Basis Technologies

Link: https://basis.com/

What it is: Basis combines planning, buying, and measurement for programmatic campaigns, often used by agencies that want an integrated workflow.

Pros:

• Useful for end-to-end operations (planning to reporting)
• Helps unify campaign setup across channels
• Agency-friendly workflow features

Cons:

• Some teams prefer separate best-of-breed tools for each layer
• You may need extra work to match your internal reporting structure

How to use it:

• Build a repeatable process for briefs, buys, and reporting
• Use it as part of media planning software tools when you want fewer handoffs

8. Mediaocean (Prisma / Innovid)

Links: https://www.mediaocean.com/ and https://www.innovid.com/

What it is: Mediaocean Prisma supports media management, buying workflows, and finance operations. Innovid focuses on ad serving and measurement for video and CTV.

Pros:

• Strong for procurement, billing, and operational control
• Good fit for large organizations with complex approvals
• Helpful for video/CTV measurement and delivery (via Innovid)

Cons:

• Heavyweight setup compared to smaller tools
• Not every team needs enterprise finance-level workflows

How to use it:

• Standardize approvals, budgets, and reconciliation across teams
• Use it as one of your best media planning tools when finance and governance drive the requirements

9. Optmyzr

Link: https://www.optmyzr.com/

What it is: Optmyzr is a PPC management and optimization platform focused on Google Ads and Microsoft Ads, with automation, scripts, and reporting helpers.

Pros:

• Saves time on repetitive PPC optimization tasks
• Helpful for audits, scripts, and structured checklists
• Good for agencies managing many accounts

Cons:

• Mostly focused on search platforms, not full omnichannel buying
• You still need strong strategy and creative inputs

How to use it:

• Automate routine bid and budget changes with clear limits
• Build repeatable reporting for search performance reviews

10. BidsCube

Link: https://www.bidscube.com/ 

What it is: BidsCube provides white-label programmatic infrastructure for teams that want more control than walled gardens, including SSP, DSP, AdExchange, and video ad serving components.

Pros:

• Supports custom setups for supply, demand, and marketplace flows
• Helps teams build their own platform experience and reporting layers
• Useful when you need control over fees, partners, and routing

Cons:

• You need technical and operational readiness to run programmatic infrastructure
• Integrations, taxonomy, and reporting design matter more than in closed platforms

How to use it:

• Build a controlled marketplace layer with a White-Label AdExchange
• Monetize supply via the SSP or activate demand via the DSP
• Run video inventory with a White-Label Video Ad Server
• Validate vendor reputation via Clutch and third-party feedback on G2

This is a different category from classic media buying tools. It fits teams that want to own more of the stack and measurement. Different teams require different platforms because each platform provides unique benefits based on their specific needs for data access and workflow development and measurement implementation. You should start by choosing three tools which align with your primary marketing channels and business objectives before you can increase your budget.

The Short Guide on How to Choose the Best Tools

Start with your workflow, not the brand name. Most tool problems come from unclear roles, messy naming, or weak measurement. The checklist enables users to pick suitable media planning tools and execution platforms which match their requirements:

• Channel mix: Search, social, CTV, display, retail media, or all of the above.
• Control needs: How much manual override you require for bids, floors, and inventory filters.
• Reporting reality: One source of truth, consistent attribution windows, and clean taxonomies.
• Team setup: Who plans, who launches, who optimizes, and who approves changes.
• Automation safety: Guardrails, alerts, and change logs.
• Data access: APIs, exports, and log-level options (when relevant).

If you want the best media planning tools, look for planning and governance features first. Then add a separate media buying tool only where it actually adds value. Many teams also keep a small set of media planning software tools for naming, QA, and reporting consistency.

Expert Opinion

Tool features matter, but process matters more. In programmatic, automation follows the rules and signals the team sets. Roman Vasyukov, CEO and Founder of BidsCube, explains where teams usually get this wrong.

Automation helps most when teams define rules first. Without pacing limits, clean naming, and shared targets, the platform will optimize for the wrong thing.

Treat automation as a multiplier which will increase your work output instead of using it as a quick solution. The organization needs to create pacing and naming protocols and shared performance indicators before it can expand its spending operations. The tool will operate at high speed but it will produce incorrect results.

Conclusion

Automation functions as a system which requires users to perform four stages of operation which include planning and execution and checks and feedback. Use digital media planning tools to set goals and constraints. Use media buying tools to execute at scale. Then use reporting and QA utilities to keep changes safe.

If walled gardens limit control or reporting, a white-label path can make sense, but only when you can support the operational load.

See how our expertise can help you to earn more

Our tech staff and AdOps are formed by the best AdTech and MarTech industry specialists with 10+ years of proven track record!

BOOK A CALL

FAQ

Why Do “AI Optimization Tools” Rarely Beat Platform Algorithms?

Platforms sit closest to the auction, so they see more signals, faster feedback, and more context than any outside tool. They also control identity, inventory access, and conversion measurement inside their ecosystems, which shapes what optimization can even “see.” External tools usually operate with delayed, incomplete, or modeled data, so they cannot consistently outbid or outlearn the native systems. 

What Should You Automate First: Pacing, Bidding, or Reporting?

Automate pacing first because it protects budget and prevents overspend when performance swings or tracking breaks. Pacing rules also reduce stress on the team, since spend stays within predictable limits while campaigns learn. The team needs to implement automated reporting to identify right away three main problems which affect attribution performance and creative content availability and unexpected CPM price spikes.

How Do You Avoid Automation Making Risky Changes at Scale?

Automation becomes dangerous when it can make large changes without constraints, especially during noisy data periods. Put strict caps on spend shifts, bid limits, and target swings so the system cannot “solve” a short-term dip by doing something extreme. Organizations need to begin their roll change implementation by securing funding for restricted market areas and one campaign class before they can introduce additional resources.

Which Tools Help Most When You Manage Campaigns Across Multiple Channels?

The failure of multi-channel management happens when different platforms operate with separate customer segments through their distinct naming systems and measurement protocols. A single planning layer helps because it establishes common objectives and financial constraints and project deadlines which all team members must follow from the same project outline. The buying process requires channel-native execution because each platform achieves its best results through its native algorithm which runs within its own environment.

When Does It Make Sense to Use a White-Label Programmatic Platform Instead of Buying via Walled Gardens?

A white-label platform becomes suitable when organizations need complete control over their operations rather than easy access to features and their team possesses the capability to manage the entire technology stack. The ability to track supply routes and select multiple business partners and establish specific payment terms and create personalized market guidelines becomes restricted when using closed ecosystems.